Illinois Data Bank

Data for Tradeoffs in sound quality and cost for passive acoustic devices

This dataset accompanies an article published in the journal Bioacoustics: "Tradeoffs in sound quality and cost for passive acoustic devices", https://doi.org/10.1080/09524622.2023.2290715. The dataset contains measurements for acoustic call files for free-flying bats simultaneously recorded on both Audiomoth and Anabat Swift passive acoustic recording devices in a conservation area in northeastern Missouri, USA. We paired calls from the two devices and compared indicators of recording quality measured in a proprietary program (Bat Call Identification Software). The dataset also contains a file enumerating the proportions of calls classified as low frequency, mid frequency, or Myotis (three phonic groups) for each type of recording device. The data were used to compare the quality and sensitivity of the two devices. The scripts for modeling procedures and figures are included in the dataset.

Life Sciences
Bats; echolocation; passive acoustic monitoring; sensors
CC0
Missouri Department of Conservation-Grant:No. 418
Joy O'Keefe
342 times
Version DOI Comment Publication Date
1 10.13012/B2IDB-4200947_V1 2023-12-06

5.78 KB File
22.8 KB File
198 KB View File
3.57 KB View File

Contact the Research Data Service for help interpreting this log.

RelatedMaterial update: {"uri"=>["", "10.1080/09524622.2023.2290715"], "uri_type"=>["", "DOI"], "citation"=>["Starbuck, C.A., L.M. DeSchepper, M.L. Hoggatt, and J.M. O'Keefe. Tradeoffs in sound quality and cost for passive acoustic devices. Bioacoustics. ", "Clarissa A. Starbuck, Logan M. DeSchepper, Meredith L. Hoggatt & Joy M. O’Keefe (12 Dec 2023): Tradeoffs in sound quality and cost for passive acoustic devices, Bioacoustics, DOI: 10.1080/09524622.2023.2290715\r\n"], "datacite_list"=>["", "IsSupplementTo"]} 2023-12-18T16:03:57Z
Research Data Service Illinois Data Bank
Access and Use Policies Web Privacy Notice Contact Us