Data for Post-retraction citation: A review of scholarly research on the spread of retracted science
Dataset Description |
Data for Post-retraction citation: A review of scholarly research on the spread of retracted science
**********
Note that following the poster, we made several changes to the dataset (see changes-since-PRC-poster.txt). For both the poster dataset and the current dataset, 5 items have 2 categories (see 5-items-have-2-categories.txt). Articles were selected from the Empirical Retraction Lit bibliography (https://infoqualitylab.org/projects/risrs2020/bibliography/ and https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5498474 ). The current dataset includes 92 items; 91 items were selected from the 386 total items in Empirical Retraction Lit bibliography version v.2.15.0 (July 2021); 1 item was added because it is the final form publication of a grouping of 2 items from the bibliography: Yang (2022) Do retraction practices work effectively? Evidence from citations of psychological retracted articles http://doi.org/10.1177/01655515221097623 Items were classified into 7 topics; 2 of the 7 topics have been analyzed to date. **********************
field-based case studies (n = 20)
FUTURE DATA TO BE ANALYZED, NOT YET COVERED:
**************
------------------
------------------
------------------
***************************
TEXT FILES provide notes for additional context. These files end in .txt. CODEBOOKS describe the data we collected. The same data is provided in both Word (.docx) and PDF format. There is one general codebook that is referred to in the other codebooks: Codebook for KEY lists fields assigned (e.g., for a journal or conference). Note that this is distinct from the overall analysis in the Empirical Retraction Lit bibliography of fields analyzed; for that analysis see Proescholdt, Randi (2021): RISRS Retraction Review - Field Variation Data. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. https://doi.org/10.13012/B2IDB-2070560_V1 Other codebooks document specific information we entered on each column of a spreadsheet. SPREADSHEETS present the data collected. The same data is provided in both Excel (.xlsx) and CSV format. Each data row describes a publication or item (e.g., thesis, poster, preprint).
*****************************
author-focused case studies of 1 or several authors with many retracted publications
*********************************
|
Subject |
Social Sciences |
Keywords |
retraction; citation of retracted publications; post-retraction citation; data extraction for scoping reviews; data extraction for literature reviews; |
License |
CC BY |
Funder |
Alfred P. Sloan Foundation-Grant:G-2020-12623 |
Funder |
Alfred P. Sloan Foundation-Grant:G-2022-19409 |
Funder |
The David F. Linowes Fellows Program |
Corresponding Creator |
Jodi Schneider |
Downloaded |
961 times |
| Version | DOI | Comment | Publication Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10.13012/B2IDB-3254797_V1 | 2023-07-14 |
Contact the Research Data Service for help interpreting this log.
| RelatedMaterial | create: {"material_type"=>"Poster", "availability"=>nil, "link"=>"https://hdl.handle.net/2142/114477", "uri"=>"hdl.handle.net/2142/114477", "uri_type"=>"Handle", "citation"=>"Jodi Schneider, Jacqueline Léveillé, Randi Proescholdt, Susmita Das, and The RISRS Team. Characterization of Publications on Post-Retraction Citation of Retracted Articles. Presented at the Ninth International Congress on Peer Review and Scientific Publication, September 8-10, 2022 hybrid in Chicago. ", "dataset_id"=>2429, "selected_type"=>"Other", "datacite_list"=>"IsSupplementTo"} | 2023-08-02T16:16:15Z |
| Dataset | update: {"description"=>["Data for Post-retraction citation: A review of scholarly research on the spread of retracted science\r\nSchneider, Jodi; Das, Susmita; Léveillé, Jacqueline; Proescholdt, Randi \r\nContact: Jodi Schneider jodi@illinois.edu & jschneider@pobox.com\r\n\r\n**********\r\nOVERVIEW \r\n**********\r\nThis dataset provides further analysis for an ongoing literature review about post-retraction citation. \r\nThis ongoing work extends a poster presented as:\r\nJodi Schneider, Jacqueline Léveillé, Randi Proescholdt, Susmita Das, and The RISRS Team. \r\nCharacterization of Publications on Post-Retraction Citation of Retracted Articles. \r\nPresented at the Ninth International Congress on Peer Review and Scientific Publication, \r\nSeptember 8-10, 2022 hybrid in Chicago. https://hdl.handle.net/2142/114477 (now also in https://peerreviewcongress.org/abstract/characterization-of-publications-on-post-retraction-citation-of-retracted-articles/ )\r\nItems as of the poster version are listed in the bibliography 92-PRC-items.pdf.\r\n\r\nNote that following the poster, we made several changes to the dataset (see changes-since-PRC-poster.txt). For both the poster dataset and the current dataset, 5 items have 2 categories (see 5-items-have-2-categories.txt).\r\n\r\nArticles were selected from the Empirical Retraction Lit bibliography (https://infoqualitylab.org/projects/risrs2020/bibliography/ and https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5498474 ). The current dataset includes 92 items; 91 items were selected from the 386 total items in Empirical Retraction Lit bibliography version v.2.15.0 (July 2021); 1 item was added because it is the final form publication of a grouping of 2 items from the bibliography: Yang (2022) Do retraction practices work effectively? Evidence from citations of psychological retracted articles http://doi.org/10.1177/01655515221097623 \r\n\r\nItems were classified into 7 topics; 2 of the 7 topics have been analyzed to date.\r\n\r\n**********************\r\nOVERVIEW OF ANALYSIS\r\n**********************\r\nDATA ANALYZED:\r\n2 of the 7 topics have been analyzed to date:\r\n\r\nfield-based case studies (n = 20)\r\nauthor-focused case studies of 1 or several authors with many retracted publications (n = 15)\r\n\r\n\r\nFUTURE DATA TO BE ANALYZED, NOT YET COVERED:\r\n5 of the 7 topics have not yet been analyzed as of this release:\r\ndatabase-focused analyses (n = 33)\r\npaper-focused case studies of 1 to 125 selected papers (n = 15)\r\nstudies of retracted publications cited in review literature (n = 8)\r\ngeographic case studies (n = 4)\r\nstudies selecting retracted publications by method (n = 2)\r\n\r\n**************\r\nFILE LISTING\r\n**************\r\n------------------\r\nBIBLIOGRAPHY \r\n------------------\r\n92-PRC-items.pdf\r\n\r\n------------------\r\nTEXT FILES\r\n------------------\r\nREADME.txt\r\n5-items-have-2-categories.txt\r\nchanges-since-PRC-poster.txt\r\n\r\n------------------\r\nCODEBOOKS\r\n------------------\r\nCodebook for authors.docx\r\nCodebook for authors.pdf\r\nCodebook for field.docx\r\nCodebook for field.pdf\r\nCodebook for KEY.docx\r\nCodebook for KEY.pdf\r\n\r\n------------------\r\nSPREADSHEETS\r\n------------------\r\nfield.csv\r\nfield.xlsx\r\nmultipleauthors.csv\r\nmultipleauthors.xlsx\r\nmultipleauthors-not-named.csv\r\nmultipleauthors-not-named.xlsx\r\nsingleauthors.csv\r\nsingleauthors.xlsx\r\n\r\n\r\n***************************\r\nDESCRIPTION OF FILE TYPES\r\n***************************\r\nBIBLIOGRAPHY (92-PRC-items.pdf) presents the items, as of the poster version. This has minor differences from the current data set. Consult changes-since-PRC-poster.txt for details on the differences.\r\n\r\nTEXT FILES provide notes for additional context. These files end in .txt.\r\n\r\nCODEBOOKS describe the data we collected. The same data is provided in both Word (.docx) and PDF format.\r\n\r\nThere is one general codebook that is referred to in the other codebooks: Codebook for KEY lists fields assigned (e.g., for a journal or conference). Note that this is distinct from the overall analysis in the Empirical Retraction Lit bibliography of fields analyzed; for that analysis see Proescholdt, Randi (2021): RISRS Retraction Review - Field Variation Data. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. https://doi.org/10.13012/B2IDB-2070560_V1\r\n\r\nOther codebooks document specific information we entered on each column of a spreadsheet. \r\n\r\n\r\nSPREADSHEETS present the data collected. The same data is provided in both Excel (.xlsx) and CSV format.\r\n\r\nEach data row describes a publication or item (e.g., thesis, poster, preprint). \r\nFor column header explainations, see the associated codebook. \r\n\r\n*****************************\r\nDETAILS ON THE SPREADSHEETS\r\n*****************************\r\nfield-based case studies\r\nCODEBOOK: Codebook for field \r\n--REFERS TO: Codebook for KEY\r\nDATA SHEET: field\r\nREFERS TO: Codebook for KEY\r\n--NUMBER OF DATA ROWS: 20 NOTE: Each data row describes a publication/item.\r\n--NUMBER OF PUBLICATION GROUPINGS: 17\r\n--GROUPED PUBLICATIONS: Rubbo (2019) - 2 items, Yang (2022) - 3 items\r\n\r\nauthor-focused case studies of 1 or several authors with many retracted publications\r\nCODEBOOK: Codebook for authors\r\n--REFERS TO: Codebook for KEY\r\nDATA SHEET 1: singleauthors (n = 9)\r\n--NUMBER OF DATA ROWS: 9\r\n--NUMBER OF PUBLICATION GROUPINGS: 9\r\nDATA SHEET 2: multipleauthors (n = 5\r\n--NUMBER OF DATA ROWS: 5\r\n--NUMBER OF PUBLICATION GROUPINGS: 5\r\nDATA SHEET 3: multipleauthors-not-named (n = 1)\r\n--NUMBER OF DATA ROWS: 1\r\n--NUMBER OF PUBLICATION GROUPINGS: 1\r\n\r\n*********************************\r\nCRediT <http://credit.niso.org> \r\n*********************************\r\nSusmita Das: Conceptualization, Data curation, Investigation, Methodology\r\nJaqueline Léveillé: Data curation, Investigation\r\nRandi Proescholdt: Conceptualization, Data curation, Investigation, Methodology\r\nJodi Schneider: Conceptualization, Data curation, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision", "Data for Post-retraction citation: A review of scholarly research on the spread of retracted science\r\nSchneider, Jodi; Das, Susmita; Léveillé, Jacqueline; Proescholdt, Randi \r\nContact: Jodi Schneider jodi@illinois.edu & jschneider@pobox.com\r\n\r\n**********\r\nOVERVIEW \r\n**********\r\nThis dataset provides further analysis for an ongoing literature review about post-retraction citation. \r\nThis ongoing work extends a poster presented as:\r\nJodi Schneider, Jacqueline Léveillé, Randi Proescholdt, Susmita Das, and The RISRS Team. Characterization of Publications on Post-Retraction Citation of Retracted Articles. Presented at the Ninth International Congress on Peer Review and Scientific Publication, September 8-10, 2022 hybrid in Chicago. https://hdl.handle.net/2142/114477 (now also in https://peerreviewcongress.org/abstract/characterization-of-publications-on-post-retraction-citation-of-retracted-articles/ )\r\nItems as of the poster version are listed in the bibliography 92-PRC-items.pdf.\r\n\r\nNote that following the poster, we made several changes to the dataset (see changes-since-PRC-poster.txt). For both the poster dataset and the current dataset, 5 items have 2 categories (see 5-items-have-2-categories.txt).\r\n\r\nArticles were selected from the Empirical Retraction Lit bibliography (https://infoqualitylab.org/projects/risrs2020/bibliography/ and https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5498474 ). The current dataset includes 92 items; 91 items were selected from the 386 total items in Empirical Retraction Lit bibliography version v.2.15.0 (July 2021); 1 item was added because it is the final form publication of a grouping of 2 items from the bibliography: Yang (2022) Do retraction practices work effectively? Evidence from citations of psychological retracted articles http://doi.org/10.1177/01655515221097623 \r\n\r\nItems were classified into 7 topics; 2 of the 7 topics have been analyzed to date.\r\n\r\n**********************\r\nOVERVIEW OF ANALYSIS\r\n**********************\r\nDATA ANALYZED:\r\n2 of the 7 topics have been analyzed to date:\r\n\r\nfield-based case studies (n = 20)\r\nauthor-focused case studies of 1 or several authors with many retracted publications (n = 15)\r\n\r\n\r\nFUTURE DATA TO BE ANALYZED, NOT YET COVERED:\r\n5 of the 7 topics have not yet been analyzed as of this release:\r\ndatabase-focused analyses (n = 33)\r\npaper-focused case studies of 1 to 125 selected papers (n = 15)\r\nstudies of retracted publications cited in review literature (n = 8)\r\ngeographic case studies (n = 4)\r\nstudies selecting retracted publications by method (n = 2)\r\n\r\n**************\r\nFILE LISTING\r\n**************\r\n------------------\r\nBIBLIOGRAPHY \r\n------------------\r\n92-PRC-items.pdf\r\n\r\n------------------\r\nTEXT FILES\r\n------------------\r\nREADME.txt\r\n5-items-have-2-categories.txt\r\nchanges-since-PRC-poster.txt\r\n\r\n------------------\r\nCODEBOOKS\r\n------------------\r\nCodebook for authors.docx\r\nCodebook for authors.pdf\r\nCodebook for field.docx\r\nCodebook for field.pdf\r\nCodebook for KEY.docx\r\nCodebook for KEY.pdf\r\n\r\n------------------\r\nSPREADSHEETS\r\n------------------\r\nfield.csv\r\nfield.xlsx\r\nmultipleauthors.csv\r\nmultipleauthors.xlsx\r\nmultipleauthors-not-named.csv\r\nmultipleauthors-not-named.xlsx\r\nsingleauthors.csv\r\nsingleauthors.xlsx\r\n\r\n\r\n***************************\r\nDESCRIPTION OF FILE TYPES\r\n***************************\r\nBIBLIOGRAPHY (92-PRC-items.pdf) presents the items, as of the poster version. This has minor differences from the current data set. Consult changes-since-PRC-poster.txt for details on the differences.\r\n\r\nTEXT FILES provide notes for additional context. These files end in .txt.\r\n\r\nCODEBOOKS describe the data we collected. The same data is provided in both Word (.docx) and PDF format.\r\n\r\nThere is one general codebook that is referred to in the other codebooks: Codebook for KEY lists fields assigned (e.g., for a journal or conference). Note that this is distinct from the overall analysis in the Empirical Retraction Lit bibliography of fields analyzed; for that analysis see Proescholdt, Randi (2021): RISRS Retraction Review - Field Variation Data. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. https://doi.org/10.13012/B2IDB-2070560_V1\r\n\r\nOther codebooks document specific information we entered on each column of a spreadsheet. \r\n\r\n\r\nSPREADSHEETS present the data collected. The same data is provided in both Excel (.xlsx) and CSV format.\r\n\r\nEach data row describes a publication or item (e.g., thesis, poster, preprint). \r\nFor column header explainations, see the associated codebook. \r\n\r\n*****************************\r\nDETAILS ON THE SPREADSHEETS\r\n*****************************\r\nfield-based case studies\r\nCODEBOOK: Codebook for field \r\n--REFERS TO: Codebook for KEY\r\nDATA SHEET: field\r\nREFERS TO: Codebook for KEY\r\n--NUMBER OF DATA ROWS: 20 NOTE: Each data row describes a publication/item.\r\n--NUMBER OF PUBLICATION GROUPINGS: 17\r\n--GROUPED PUBLICATIONS: Rubbo (2019) - 2 items, Yang (2022) - 3 items\r\n\r\nauthor-focused case studies of 1 or several authors with many retracted publications\r\nCODEBOOK: Codebook for authors\r\n--REFERS TO: Codebook for KEY\r\nDATA SHEET 1: singleauthors (n = 9)\r\n--NUMBER OF DATA ROWS: 9\r\n--NUMBER OF PUBLICATION GROUPINGS: 9\r\nDATA SHEET 2: multipleauthors (n = 5\r\n--NUMBER OF DATA ROWS: 5\r\n--NUMBER OF PUBLICATION GROUPINGS: 5\r\nDATA SHEET 3: multipleauthors-not-named (n = 1)\r\n--NUMBER OF DATA ROWS: 1\r\n--NUMBER OF PUBLICATION GROUPINGS: 1\r\n\r\n*********************************\r\nCRediT <http://credit.niso.org> \r\n*********************************\r\nSusmita Das: Conceptualization, Data curation, Investigation, Methodology\r\nJaqueline Léveillé: Data curation, Investigation\r\nRandi Proescholdt: Conceptualization, Data curation, Investigation, Methodology\r\nJodi Schneider: Conceptualization, Data curation, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision"], "version_comment"=>[nil, ""], "subject"=>[nil, "Social Sciences"]} | 2023-08-02T16:16:15Z |
| Dataset | update: {"description"=>["Data for Post-retraction citation: A review of scholarly research on the spread of retracted science\r\nSchneider, Jodi; Das, Susmita; Léveillé, Jacqueline; Proescholdt, Randi \r\nContact: Jodi Schneider jodi@illinois.edu & jschneider@pobox.com\r\n\r\n**********\r\nOVERVIEW \r\n**********\r\nThis dataset provides further analysis for an ongoing literature review about post-retraction citation. \r\nThis ongoing work extends a poster presented as:\r\nJodi Schneider, Jacqueline Léveillé, Randi Proescholdt, Susmita Das, and The RISRS Team. \r\nCharacterization of Publications on Post-Retraction Citation of Retracted Articles. \r\nPresented at the Ninth International Congress on Peer Review and Scientific Publication, \r\nSeptember 8-10, 2022 hybrid in Chicago. https://hdl.handle.net/2142/114477\r\nItems as of the poster version are listed in the bibliography 92-PRC-items.pdf.\r\n\r\nNote that following the poster, we made several changes to the dataset (see changes-since-PRC-poster.txt). For both the poster dataset and the current dataset, 5 items have 2 categories (see 5-items-have-2-categories.txt).\r\n\r\nArticles were selected from the Empirical Retraction Lit bibliography (https://infoqualitylab.org/projects/risrs2020/bibliography/ and https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5498474 ). The current dataset includes 92 items; 91 items were selected from the 386 total items in Empirical Retraction Lit bibliography version v.2.15.0 (July 2021); 1 item was added because it is the final form publication of a grouping of 2 items from the bibliography: Yang (2022) Do retraction practices work effectively? Evidence from citations of psychological retracted articles http://doi.org/10.1177/01655515221097623 \r\n\r\nItems were classified into 7 topics; 2 of the 7 topics have been analyzed to date.\r\n\r\n**********************\r\nOVERVIEW OF ANALYSIS\r\n**********************\r\nDATA ANALYZED:\r\n2 of the 7 topics have been analyzed to date:\r\n\r\nfield-based case studies (n = 20)\r\nauthor-focused case studies of 1 or several authors with many retracted publications (n = 15)\r\n\r\n\r\nFUTURE DATA TO BE ANALYZED, NOT YET COVERED:\r\n5 of the 7 topics have not yet been analyzed as of this release:\r\ndatabase-focused analyses (n = 33)\r\npaper-focused case studies of 1 to 125 selected papers (n = 15)\r\nstudies of retracted publications cited in review literature (n = 8)\r\ngeographic case studies (n = 4)\r\nstudies selecting retracted publications by method (n = 2)\r\n\r\n**************\r\nFILE LISTING\r\n**************\r\n------------------\r\nBIBLIOGRAPHY \r\n------------------\r\n92-PRC-items.pdf\r\n\r\n------------------\r\nTEXT FILES\r\n------------------\r\nREADME.txt\r\n5-items-have-2-categories.txt\r\nchanges-since-PRC-poster.txt\r\n\r\n------------------\r\nCODEBOOKS\r\n------------------\r\nCodebook for authors.docx\r\nCodebook for authors.pdf\r\nCodebook for field.docx\r\nCodebook for field.pdf\r\nCodebook for KEY.docx\r\nCodebook for KEY.pdf\r\n\r\n------------------\r\nSPREADSHEETS\r\n------------------\r\nfield.csv\r\nfield.xlsx\r\nmultipleauthors.csv\r\nmultipleauthors.xlsx\r\nmultipleauthors-not-named.csv\r\nmultipleauthors-not-named.xlsx\r\nsingleauthors.csv\r\nsingleauthors.xlsx\r\n\r\n\r\n***************************\r\nDESCRIPTION OF FILE TYPES\r\n***************************\r\nBIBLIOGRAPHY (92-PRC-items.pdf) presents the items, as of the poster version. This has minor differences from the current data set. Consult changes-since-PRC-poster.txt for details on the differences.\r\n\r\nTEXT FILES provide notes for additional context. These files end in .txt.\r\n\r\nCODEBOOKS describe the data we collected. The same data is provided in both Word (.docx) and PDF format.\r\n\r\nThere is one general codebook that is referred to in the other codebooks: Codebook for KEY lists fields assigned (e.g., for a journal or conference). Note that this is distinct from the overall analysis in the Empirical Retraction Lit bibliography of fields analyzed; for that analysis see Proescholdt, Randi (2021): RISRS Retraction Review - Field Variation Data. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. https://doi.org/10.13012/B2IDB-2070560_V1\r\n\r\nOther codebooks document specific information we entered on each column of a spreadsheet. \r\n\r\n\r\nSPREADSHEETS present the data collected. The same data is provided in both Excel (.xlsx) and CSV format.\r\n\r\nEach data row describes a publication or item (e.g., thesis, poster, preprint). \r\nFor column header explainations, see the associated codebook. \r\n\r\n*****************************\r\nDETAILS ON THE SPREADSHEETS\r\n*****************************\r\nfield-based case studies\r\nCODEBOOK: Codebook for field \r\n--REFERS TO: Codebook for KEY\r\nDATA SHEET: field\r\nREFERS TO: Codebook for KEY\r\n--NUMBER OF DATA ROWS: 20 NOTE: Each data row describes a publication/item.\r\n--NUMBER OF PUBLICATION GROUPINGS: 17\r\n--GROUPED PUBLICATIONS: Rubbo (2019) - 2 items, Yang (2022) - 3 items\r\n\r\nauthor-focused case studies of 1 or several authors with many retracted publications\r\nCODEBOOK: Codebook for authors\r\n--REFERS TO: Codebook for KEY\r\nDATA SHEET 1: singleauthors (n = 9)\r\n--NUMBER OF DATA ROWS: 9\r\n--NUMBER OF PUBLICATION GROUPINGS: 9\r\nDATA SHEET 2: multipleauthors (n = 5\r\n--NUMBER OF DATA ROWS: 5\r\n--NUMBER OF PUBLICATION GROUPINGS: 5\r\nDATA SHEET 3: multipleauthors-not-named (n = 1)\r\n--NUMBER OF DATA ROWS: 1\r\n--NUMBER OF PUBLICATION GROUPINGS: 1\r\n\r\n*********************************\r\nCRediT <http://credit.niso.org> \r\n*********************************\r\nSusmita Das: Conceptualization, Data curation, Investigation, Methodology\r\nJaqueline Léveillé: Data curation, Investigation\r\nRandi Proescholdt: Conceptualization, Data curation, Investigation, Methodology\r\nJodi Schneider: Conceptualization, Data curation, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision", "Data for Post-retraction citation: A review of scholarly research on the spread of retracted science\r\nSchneider, Jodi; Das, Susmita; Léveillé, Jacqueline; Proescholdt, Randi \r\nContact: Jodi Schneider jodi@illinois.edu & jschneider@pobox.com\r\n\r\n**********\r\nOVERVIEW \r\n**********\r\nThis dataset provides further analysis for an ongoing literature review about post-retraction citation. \r\nThis ongoing work extends a poster presented as:\r\nJodi Schneider, Jacqueline Léveillé, Randi Proescholdt, Susmita Das, and The RISRS Team. \r\nCharacterization of Publications on Post-Retraction Citation of Retracted Articles. \r\nPresented at the Ninth International Congress on Peer Review and Scientific Publication, \r\nSeptember 8-10, 2022 hybrid in Chicago. https://hdl.handle.net/2142/114477 (now also in https://peerreviewcongress.org/abstract/characterization-of-publications-on-post-retraction-citation-of-retracted-articles/ )\r\nItems as of the poster version are listed in the bibliography 92-PRC-items.pdf.\r\n\r\nNote that following the poster, we made several changes to the dataset (see changes-since-PRC-poster.txt). For both the poster dataset and the current dataset, 5 items have 2 categories (see 5-items-have-2-categories.txt).\r\n\r\nArticles were selected from the Empirical Retraction Lit bibliography (https://infoqualitylab.org/projects/risrs2020/bibliography/ and https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5498474 ). The current dataset includes 92 items; 91 items were selected from the 386 total items in Empirical Retraction Lit bibliography version v.2.15.0 (July 2021); 1 item was added because it is the final form publication of a grouping of 2 items from the bibliography: Yang (2022) Do retraction practices work effectively? Evidence from citations of psychological retracted articles http://doi.org/10.1177/01655515221097623 \r\n\r\nItems were classified into 7 topics; 2 of the 7 topics have been analyzed to date.\r\n\r\n**********************\r\nOVERVIEW OF ANALYSIS\r\n**********************\r\nDATA ANALYZED:\r\n2 of the 7 topics have been analyzed to date:\r\n\r\nfield-based case studies (n = 20)\r\nauthor-focused case studies of 1 or several authors with many retracted publications (n = 15)\r\n\r\n\r\nFUTURE DATA TO BE ANALYZED, NOT YET COVERED:\r\n5 of the 7 topics have not yet been analyzed as of this release:\r\ndatabase-focused analyses (n = 33)\r\npaper-focused case studies of 1 to 125 selected papers (n = 15)\r\nstudies of retracted publications cited in review literature (n = 8)\r\ngeographic case studies (n = 4)\r\nstudies selecting retracted publications by method (n = 2)\r\n\r\n**************\r\nFILE LISTING\r\n**************\r\n------------------\r\nBIBLIOGRAPHY \r\n------------------\r\n92-PRC-items.pdf\r\n\r\n------------------\r\nTEXT FILES\r\n------------------\r\nREADME.txt\r\n5-items-have-2-categories.txt\r\nchanges-since-PRC-poster.txt\r\n\r\n------------------\r\nCODEBOOKS\r\n------------------\r\nCodebook for authors.docx\r\nCodebook for authors.pdf\r\nCodebook for field.docx\r\nCodebook for field.pdf\r\nCodebook for KEY.docx\r\nCodebook for KEY.pdf\r\n\r\n------------------\r\nSPREADSHEETS\r\n------------------\r\nfield.csv\r\nfield.xlsx\r\nmultipleauthors.csv\r\nmultipleauthors.xlsx\r\nmultipleauthors-not-named.csv\r\nmultipleauthors-not-named.xlsx\r\nsingleauthors.csv\r\nsingleauthors.xlsx\r\n\r\n\r\n***************************\r\nDESCRIPTION OF FILE TYPES\r\n***************************\r\nBIBLIOGRAPHY (92-PRC-items.pdf) presents the items, as of the poster version. This has minor differences from the current data set. Consult changes-since-PRC-poster.txt for details on the differences.\r\n\r\nTEXT FILES provide notes for additional context. These files end in .txt.\r\n\r\nCODEBOOKS describe the data we collected. The same data is provided in both Word (.docx) and PDF format.\r\n\r\nThere is one general codebook that is referred to in the other codebooks: Codebook for KEY lists fields assigned (e.g., for a journal or conference). Note that this is distinct from the overall analysis in the Empirical Retraction Lit bibliography of fields analyzed; for that analysis see Proescholdt, Randi (2021): RISRS Retraction Review - Field Variation Data. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. https://doi.org/10.13012/B2IDB-2070560_V1\r\n\r\nOther codebooks document specific information we entered on each column of a spreadsheet. \r\n\r\n\r\nSPREADSHEETS present the data collected. The same data is provided in both Excel (.xlsx) and CSV format.\r\n\r\nEach data row describes a publication or item (e.g., thesis, poster, preprint). \r\nFor column header explainations, see the associated codebook. \r\n\r\n*****************************\r\nDETAILS ON THE SPREADSHEETS\r\n*****************************\r\nfield-based case studies\r\nCODEBOOK: Codebook for field \r\n--REFERS TO: Codebook for KEY\r\nDATA SHEET: field\r\nREFERS TO: Codebook for KEY\r\n--NUMBER OF DATA ROWS: 20 NOTE: Each data row describes a publication/item.\r\n--NUMBER OF PUBLICATION GROUPINGS: 17\r\n--GROUPED PUBLICATIONS: Rubbo (2019) - 2 items, Yang (2022) - 3 items\r\n\r\nauthor-focused case studies of 1 or several authors with many retracted publications\r\nCODEBOOK: Codebook for authors\r\n--REFERS TO: Codebook for KEY\r\nDATA SHEET 1: singleauthors (n = 9)\r\n--NUMBER OF DATA ROWS: 9\r\n--NUMBER OF PUBLICATION GROUPINGS: 9\r\nDATA SHEET 2: multipleauthors (n = 5\r\n--NUMBER OF DATA ROWS: 5\r\n--NUMBER OF PUBLICATION GROUPINGS: 5\r\nDATA SHEET 3: multipleauthors-not-named (n = 1)\r\n--NUMBER OF DATA ROWS: 1\r\n--NUMBER OF PUBLICATION GROUPINGS: 1\r\n\r\n*********************************\r\nCRediT <http://credit.niso.org> \r\n*********************************\r\nSusmita Das: Conceptualization, Data curation, Investigation, Methodology\r\nJaqueline Léveillé: Data curation, Investigation\r\nRandi Proescholdt: Conceptualization, Data curation, Investigation, Methodology\r\nJodi Schneider: Conceptualization, Data curation, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision"]} | 2023-07-21T14:58:19Z |